SPIEF 2017: From Wider Europe to a Big Eurasian Partnership?

June 1st to 3rd, 2017 the annual Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF 2017) took place. The content of the sections and the geographical structure of the foreign business representatives, mainly French and Hindu, showed that the concept of a common space from Lisbon to Vladivostok, as well as the project of the Big Eurasian Partnership (BEP), were the main focus points of the forum, along with the digitalization agenda of the EAEU economy. The director of the Center for Eurasian Studies (CES) Jurij Kofner participated in the work of the “Russian Davos”.

IMG_0129

Sergei Glazyev, the Russian President’s advisor on regional economic integration.

Wider Europe

The project, which not so long ago was declared dead by the Russian expert community,  is far from it. At least this can be judged from the big attention, that European business at the SPIEF paid to the concept of  the “EU – EAEU common economic space”. Dedicated to this topic were the sections “Europe at the Crossroads: Risks and Prospects” (June 2nd); “European and Eurasian integration” (June 1st), as well as the international “Conference on the development of cooperation in the area from Lisbon to Vladivostok” (31 May) which took place at “day zero” of the forum with the participation of leading corporations (e.g. SCHNEIDER GROUP) and business associations from Germany, France and Italy.

IMG_0007

Conference on the development of cooperation in the area from Lisbon to Vladivostok.

IMG_0054

Štefan Füle, European Commissioner for Enlargement and European Neighborhood Policy (2010 – 2014).

The essence of all discussions on this matter can be resumed as follows: 1. European business is extremely interested in the creation of a common space between the EU and the EAEU. 2. The problem lies in the political unwillingness of Brussels under US influence to recognize the Eurasian Union as a subject of international law, which is very upsetting to European entrepreneurs. However intellectual preparations of a potential “mega deal” are already spearheaded by research done at IIASA (Laxenburg, Austria). 3. Negotiations should be conducted not between the EU and Russia, but between Brussels and the Eurasian Economic Commission. 4. In the geo-economic sense, this common economic space is necessary for both parties primarily as a union of European capital and technology with Eurasian resources and human capital. Only such an alliance can be competitive in the 21st century. 5. In spite of the possible compromises, the interests of modernization, industrialization and integration of the economies of the EAEU Member-States should be a priorit for the EEC. 6. The  Lisbon to Vladivostok concept should be seen not as an alternative, but rather as part of the Big Eurasian Partnership idea.

IMG_0161

Tigran Sargsyan, Chairman of the Board of EEC and Sergey Karaganov, Dean of the Faculty of World Economics and International Policy at the HSE. Section “European and Eurasian integration.” 

IMG_0144

Viktor Khristenko, President of the EAEU Business Council, Chairman of the Board of EEC (2012 – 2015).

Bigger Eurasia

Therefore it is necessary to think about the larger Eurasian region not only in the horizontal aspect, but also in a north-south dimension: from St. Petersburg to Singapore. A free trade area (FTA) between the EAEU and Vietnam has been operating since October 2015. June 3rd, 2017 on the sidelines SPIEF the start of negotiations to conclude an FTA agreement between the Eurasian Economic Union and the Republic of India was officially announced. The analysis showed that the reciprocal liberalization of the trade regime will lead to GDP growth of of all countries of the EAEU and India already the short term. In addition, according to experts, trade turnover may rise by 30 to 40% of the current level depending on the tariff liberalization depth that is reached after the negotiations. This was at the center of attention at two sections: “EAEU – India: towards a strategic partnership” (June 1st) and ” SCO and the prospects for the formation of the Big Eurasian Partnership ” (1 June). The main issues of the second discussion were the enlargment of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and the definition of its main objectives and tasks in the 21st century. That the southern dimension of the EEC’s international cooperation is not limited within the Eurasian continent was seen at the section “EAEU – Latin America: stepping up cooperation” (June 2nd).

IMG_0137

Business Breakfast “EAEU – India: towards a strategic partnership.”

IMG_0201

Section “SCO and the prospects for the formation of the Big Eurasian Partnership”.

IMG_0139

Veronica Nikishina, member of the Board (Minister) for Trade of the EEC.

The Eurasian Economic Union is a young integration organization. The Saint-Petersburg International Economic Forum showed that it, nevertheless, is already becoming an important pole of the world economy and more and more actively determines the agenda of the global economic architecture.

IMG_0233

Section “EAEU – Latin America: stepping up cooperation.”

IMG_0218

Rashid Alimov, Secretary General of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.

CES

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *